WebDec 15, 1994 · The Ikarian Reefer, which was owned by Comninos Brothers, was lost. before the two split up to each run their separate companies: Costas. with Comninos Enterprises and Anthony with Target Marine. WebThe Ikarian Reefer (http://forensic-pc.com/documents/163584FAQ2.pdf) The principle duties and responsibilities of an expert witness have been summarized by Mr. Justice Cresswell in National Justice Compania Naviera SA v Prudential Assurance Company Ltd. , (also known as the “Ikarian Reefer” case).

Expert Evidence: New Rules Confirm Existing Responsibilities

WebIn The Ikarian Reefer 2 Judge Humphrey Lloyd’s Rep 68 the author summarises some of the duties and responsibilities of expert witnesses in civil cases. Since that decision there has been a growing recognition of … WebJun 8, 2024 · To see how the role of an expert has been described in the most quoted English court judgment on the matter, one should review the judgment of Mr Justice Creswell in National Justice Compania Naviera SA versus Prudential Assurance Company Limited (commonly referred to as the ‘Ikarian Reefer’ case, [1993] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 68). penn state bulletin of courses

The "Ikarian Reefer" - uniset.ca

http://www.uniset.ca/other/cs2/19951LLR455.html WebOct 12, 1999 · The claim was made on the basis that the Ikarian Reefer was a constructive total loss following grounding and a fire in April 1985. Prudential defended the claim on the ground that the vessel had been deliberately cast away by her owners. At the trial, Cresswell J gave judgment in favour of the owners [1993] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 68. WebNov 1, 2024 · See Also – The Ikarian Reefer CA 1995 The court reversed the decision of the trial judge that the plaintiff insured shipowners had not deliberately scuttled their vessel or cast her away: ‘ (1) The burden of showing that the trial Judge was wrong lies on the appellant . . (2) When . . Cited – Bowman, Regina v CACD 2-Mar-2006 penn state buckhout lab